Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Greater Phoenix Chapter

Old Home Home Contact Us Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Photos
Videos
Church State Issues Report Church State Violations Join
Email List
Leave
Email List
Membership Donations Request
Speaker
Take
Action
Legal
Resources
Facebook Meetup Links Send Letter to Editor

                                                                                                                       

Church State Issues

Oregon judge: Upskirt photos of teen at store not illegal

Feb 7, 2015

Arizona Republic

Don't these police officers and prosecutors have any REAL criminals to hunt down???

I have read articles from across the USA where parents were arrested as child molesters for innocent photos they took of their baby children when a photo processor at Wal-Mart or Target turned them into the police.


Oregon judge: Upskirt photos of teen at store not illegal

Associated Press 12:49 p.m. MST February 6, 2015

HILLSBORO, Ore. — An Oregon judge has ruled that a 61-year-old man did nothing illegal when he crouched in the aisle of a Target store and snapped photos up a 13-year-old's skirt.

It was lewd and appalling, but not outlawed, Washington County Judge Eric Butterfield said.

"From a legal point of view, which unfortunately today is my job to enforce, he didn't do anything wrong," the judge said Thursday.

Patrick Buono of Portland didn't dispute using his cellphone to take upskirt photos on Jan. 3 at the store in suburban Beaverton, The Oregonian reported.

But his defense lawyer, Mark Lawrence, argued Buono didn't violate the laws against invasion of privacy and attempted encouraging child sexual abuse, a child pornography count.

The privacy law bans clandestine photography in bathrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms and tanning booths, but the Target aisle was plainly public, Lawrence said.

Upskirt sightings can occur by happenstance, he said, citing a famous photo of Marilyn Monroe with her dress flying up. And that could happen to someone riding up an escalator, taking a spill or exiting a car, he said.

"These things are not only seen but video-recorded," Lawrence said. "It's incumbent on us as citizens to cover up whatever we don't want filmed in public places."

The privacy law also specifies nudity, and the girl was wearing underwear, Lawrence said.

The prosecutor conceded that the lack of nudity was a "live issue in this case," but he argued the charge applied.

"Sure, she's in a public place. But she had an expectation of privacy that a deviant isn't going to stick a camera up her skirt and capture private images of her body," Deputy District Attorney Paul Maloney said.

As for the charge related to child sex abuse, Lawrence said, the girl was not engaging in sexual conduct, which that statute specifies.

Maloney said Buono took the photos hoping they would be explicit.

Butterfield said the teenager's private parts were covered, and her conduct was not sexual.

The judge called his decision to acquit Buono "upsetting to say the least."

After the ruling, Buono shook his lawyer's hand and hurried from the courtroom.