Don't these government bureaucrats have any real criminals to hunt down???
On the other hand I guess it's a lot safer to arrest some computer
geek who takes
upskirt photos then it is to arrest a dangerous armed bank robber.
For the same reasons cops love to arrest people for the victimless
crime of smoking marijuana, rather then hunting down dangerous armed
These so called "upskirt" laws also seem to be a violation of the
Lawmakers ban 'upskirt' photos a day after ruling
Associated Press Thu Mar 6, 2014 4:32 PM
BOSTON -- A day after the state's highest court upheld the legality of
"upskirt" photos, Massachusetts lawmakers Thursday voted to ban the
secret pictures of women's and children's "sexual or intimate parts."
The measure, which sailed through the House and Senate, awaits Gov.
Deval Patrick's likely signature.
Renegade paparazzi could be jailed more than two years and fined
$5,000 if the victim is 18 or older, but the penalties would jump to
five years behind bars or a $10,000 fine for anyone under age.
"It is sexual harassment. It is an assault on another person ... women
and children should be able to go to public places without feeling
like they are not protected by the law," Senate President Therese
Murray said after the vote, Boston.com reported.
The unusually swift action followed the Supreme Judicial Court's
ruling Wednesday that a Boston subway rider who took cellphone photos
up women's skirts didn't violate the state's "Peeping Tom" law. The
judges said that although the law protected someone's privacy in
dressing rooms and bathrooms while naked or partially clothed, it did
not protect people in public.
House Speaker Robert DeLeo said his chamber acted "to bring
Massachusetts laws up-to-date with technology and the predatory
practice of 'upskirting.' We must make sure that the law protects
women from these kind of frightening and degrading acts."