Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Greater Phoenix Chapter

Old Home Home Contact Us Upcoming
Church State Issues Report Church State Violations Join
Email List
Email List
Membership Donations Request
Facebook Meetup Links Send Letter to Editor


Church State Issues

NSA to contract out it's criminal activities to private firms???

Mar 29, 2014

Washington Post

NSA to contract out it's criminal activities to private firms???

Emerging political consensus supports end to NSA collection of Americans’s phone records

By Ellen Nakashima, Published: March 25 E-mail the writer

For those not following the ins and outs of National Security Agency surveillance reform, the one big takeaway is this: There is an emerging consensus from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to Capitol Hill that the government’s mass collection of data about Americans’ phone calls must end. [Well, not exactly, the government must stop doing these criminal acts and contract with the private sector to commit the crimes and civil rights violations]

President Obama said Tuesday that the intelligence community has given him a plan to get there, and key factions in Congress have developed various alternatives. [Yea, have NSA contract private telephone and internet companies to do the illegal snooping and spying on American citizens]

The questions are: Which version or which hybrid of versions will emerge the winner? And what will the result mean for Americans?

The answer to the former: It’s too soon to tell.

The answer to the latter: No matter which version emerges, the days of the government collecting Americans’ phone records in bulk are numbered. [Well the government will still GET the data, it will just hire private firms to illegally get the data from American citizens.]

In truth, momentum has been building toward that since June, when the NSA’s program that collects billions of records on Americans’ phone call activity was disclosed in a document leaked by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

What the NSA has been collecting is “metadata” — numbers dialed, times and lengths of calls — not the content of conversations. The goal was to have numbers that analysts could search when they were looking for clues to terrorism plots. Several major phone companies have been turning over their caches of data to the agency every day since 2006, under court orders. [Wow using a court order to justify forcing a private company to commit crimes seems so ethical!!!!! Just joking.]

Although the administration and some judges have said the program is lawful and constitutional, Obama concluded in January that its scale — collecting tens of billions of citizens’ records that are stored for five years at the NSA — was making too many people uncomfortable about the potential for abuse. He ordered his subordinates to find a way to end the government’s collection of so many records.

Obama said he thinks the plan he has is “workable.” Essentially, the phone companies would keep records about who called whom just as they always have. (Some companies keep such information for a year or two, others for 10 years.) A judge would determine that a number the government wants data on is linked to a terrorist organization. Then the phone company would send the government all call activity linked to that number, in real time, as it comes in. [Translation - Obama will shift the NSA's criminal activities to the private sector. Kind of like if the Mafia started hiring civilian contractors from the Ayran Brotherhood to commit it's murders]

This plan has two key features: It requires judicial approval before a number can be searched, a requisite for privacy advocates. [Yea, a rubber stamp from one of those secret courts, that keep no records.] Second, it does not require the phone companies to hold the data longer than they normally would. That was a prospect the firms opposed. [Well to be honest the phone companies will hold the data as long as Uncle Sam's goons pay them to hold he data.]

But a downside, privacy advocates say, is that it apparently does not address all forms of mass data collection — just telephone records. [Who cares, most dumb Americans will believe Obama's lame excuse that Obama has stopped spying on them]

The law used to justify the NSA collection, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, can be interpreted to apply to other forms of data, such as credit card records and phone location data, reform advocates argue. “If we’re going to fix it, let’s fix it right and end bulk collection for all types of data,” said Harley Geiger, senior counsel at the Center for Democracy & Technology.

A bill introduced Tuesday by the leaders of the House Intelligence Committee also would end bulk collection. And the measure seems to go further than the White House’s approach in that it would outlaw such collection of other types of data. [Sorry guys, it already IS illegal. Have you heard of a thing called the 4th Amendment??? OK, so you could care less about the Fourth Amendment???] But it would allow the government to submit the phone numbers to the companies first and then seek a judge’s okay that the numbers were linked to a terrorist group or foreign power. The lack of prior judicial approval makes that approach unworkable for many privacy advocates.

What’s significant about the bill, introduced by Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (Md.), the panel’s ranking Democrat, is that its sponsors are staunch defenders of the national security agencies. The fact that they have a measure that would end bulk collection shows how far the political climate has shifted in the past year. [No it won't end the government illegal collection of phone and email records. The government will just hire private contractors to commit the illegal data collecting. And you thought your Congressman was dumb. He's not dumb, he is an unethical crooks that knows how to shift the blame of his government crimes to the private sector]

The Obama administration and House intelligence panel’s bill would let the government seek records two “hops” removed from a suspect number.

A third major approach — what privacy advocates consider the “gold standard” — is the USA Freedom Act, co-sponsored by Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.). That bill, which has not advanced in either chamber of Congress, would end bulk collection in all forms. It requires judicial approval before companies can turn over data linked to a particular number.

Capitol Hill watchers say it’s too soon to tell what version might gain the necessary votes to pass.

If no one does anything, the underlying law — Section 215 — will expire in June 2015. It is widely acknowledged that Congress lacks the votes to extend it without changes. Bulk collection under that authority would end. As Michelle Richardson of the American Civil Liberties Union said, “Let the whole dang thing sunset.”

But, reform advocates including Richardson say, they want to take advantage of the momentum now to make broader fixes. The bottom line: Change is in the air.